The U.S. CLOUD Act and the EU: A Privacy Protection Race to the Bottom | Electronic Frontier Foundation April 11, 2018
Posted by sandyclaus in Copyright and Trademark Enforcement, Security, Security State.add a comment
U.S. President Donald Trump’s $1.3 trillion government spending bill, signed March 23rd, offered 2,323 pages of budgeting on issues ranging from domestic drug policy to defense. The last-minute rush to fund the U.S. government through this all-or-nothing “omnibus” presented legislators with a golden opportunity to insert policies that would escape deep public scrutiny. Case in point: the Clarifying Lawful Use of Overseas Data (CLOUD) Act, whose broad ramifications for undermining global privacy should not be underestimated, was snuck into the final pages of the bill before the vote. Between the U.S. CLOUD Act and new European Union (EU) efforts to dismantle international rules for cross-border law enforcement investigations, the United States and EU are racing against one another towards an unfortunate finish-line: weaker privacy protections around the globe. The U.S. CLOUD Act allows the U.S. President to enter into “executive agreements” with qualifying foreign governments in order to directly access data held by U.S. technology companies at a lower standard than required by the Constitution of the United States. To qualify, foreign governments would need to be certified by the U.S. Attorney General, and meet certain human rights standards set in the act. Those qualifying governments will have the ability to bypass the legal safeguards of the Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty (MLAT) regime.
Genetically Engineered “Terminator Seeds”. Death and Destruction of Agriculture | Global Research – Centre for Research on Globalization May 26, 2015
Posted by sandyclaus in Copyright and Trademark Enforcement, Food Culture, Futurist.add a comment
This article was first published by Global Research in January 2013
The widely held belief is that genetically modified ‘terminator seeds’ are not available on the commercial market anywhere. Since 2001, there has been a de facto worldwide moratorium on the use of terminator technology (UN Convention on Biological Diversity). By definition, such seeds are genetically engineered to make them sterile and unusable for replanting, resulting in farmers having to buy new seeds from a central supplier each year.
Under Article 28 of the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (the TRIPS Agreement), “planting, harvesting, saving, re-planting, and exchanging seeds of patented plants, or of plants containing patented cells and genes, constitutes use,” and is prohibited by the intellectual property laws of signatory states
Mo Med – January February 2015 : CORRESPONDENCE May 26, 2015
Posted by sandyclaus in Copyright and Trademark Enforcement, Food Culture, Futurist.add a comment
GMO Author Reponds to Food For Thought
Thank you for taking the time to read and comment on my article. As I discussed in the article, from all of the studies conducted to look at the safety of GM crops, there is no evidence that they are any different, in terms of public or animal health, from crops developed by conventional breeding practices. I refer you to Nicolia et al. (reference 24) and the reports of the NRC and European Commission that address these claims directly for both livestock and humans. As a scientist, and as I am sure you are aware, one has to be very careful in how you interpret or act upon simple correlations and until one applies scientific rigor and methods to obtain reliable data to gain objective insight they remain hypothetical. There has been an equally strong increase in organic food sales since 1996 that tracks the increase in the production of GM crops. The independent variables that lay between any of these comparisons are numerous and would require specific studies to address any cause and effect relationships. Many such studies have been conducted by numerous agencies and researchers, as I document in my article, and there is no substantiated link between adverse health issues and GM crops. As for scientific consensus, I think I have documented that extensively in the article (for more information, see reports on GMOs by the American Medical Association, the National Academy of Science, The Royal Society of London, European Plant Science Organization, and the American Society of Plant Biologists among others). From a scientific perspective, it is difficult to comment on the 1998 lawsuit without having scientific data and information that might have factored into any deliberations that led to its dismissal.
Melvin J. Oliver, PhD Supervisory Research Geneticist, USDA Agricultural Research Service University of Missouri
Censored, 1999: The News that Didn’t Make the News — the Year’s Top 25 … – Peter Phillips, Project Censored (U.S.), Tom Tomorrow – Google Books May 26, 2015
Posted by sandyclaus in Copyright and Trademark Enforcement, Food Culture, Futurist.add a comment
The Teminator Technology: RAFI-USA Press Release May 26, 2015
Posted by sandyclaus in Copyright and Trademark Enforcement, Food Culture, Futurist.add a comment
The claimed source f the “Terminator Gene” name.
Rural Advancement Foundation International – RAFI
Press Release – 27 January 1999
——————————————
Genetic Seed Sterilization is “Holy Grail”
for Ag Biotechnology Firms
——————————————
New Patents for “Suicide Seeds” Threaten
Farmers and Food Security Warns RAFI
The Rural Advancement Foundation International (RAFI), a Canadian-based
rural advocacy organization, announced today that it has uncovered over
three dozen new patents describing a wide range of techniques that can be
used for the genetic sterilization of plants and seeds. “The patents reveal
that engineered seed sterility is not an isolated research agenda – it’s
the Holy Grail of the ag biotech industry,” says Pat Mooney of RAFI. The
disclosure follows on the heels of a controversial patent unveiled last
year, christened the “Terminator” by RAFI, that continues to generate
worldwide protest and debate because it renders farm-saved seed sterile –
forcing farmers to return to the commercial seed market every year. The
Terminator patent is jointly owned by the US Department of Agriculture and
a Monsanto subsidiary, Delta & Pine Land Co.
“The notorious Terminator patent is just the tip of the iceberg,” explains
RAFI’s Mooney, “Every major seed and agrochemical enterprise is developing
its own version of suicide seeds,” he adds.
“We’ve uncovered dozens of patents that disclose new and more insidious
techniques for genetic sterilization of plants and seeds – and even
animals,” says Edward Hammond of RAFI. “Novartis, AstraZeneca, and Monsanto
are among the Gene Giants who have sterile seeds in the pipeline, while
others like Pioneer Hi-Bred, Rhone Poulenc, and DuPont have technologies
that could easily be turned into Terminators.” The primary goal of several
of the the newly patented techniques is to sterilize seed so that farmers
cannot save and re-plant seed.
A number of the patents use benign-sounding technical terms such as
“controlled gene expression” linked to “inducible promoters” to describe
their sterilization techniques. Other patents describe “killer genes” that
destroy pollen, or “GRIM proteins” that do the same to invertebrates or
even mammalian cells. A patent owned by Astra/Zeneca candidly admits that
their sterilization processes “are not desirable per se.”
Sterile Seeds: Why Worry? “These technologies are extremely dangerous,”
explains RAFI’s Mooney, “because over 1.4 billion farmers – primarily poor
farmers in Africa, Asia and Latin America – depend on farm-saved seed as
their primary seed source. If they can’t save seed, they can’t continue to
adapt crops to their unique farming environments, and that spells disaster
for global food security.”
Slyck.com – Contact Us February 1, 2014
Posted by sandyclaus in Computer Security, Copyright and Trademark Enforcement, Politics, Privacy, Technology Reporting.add a comment
AdministratorsThomas MenneckeWebsite Administrator / News Editor / WriterHouseCrowdForum Ringleader and Backroom Specialist?MrFredPFLSurly BastardNews WritersThomas MenneckeForum Moderators/AdminsMrs. 2pHouseCrowdMrFredPFLRenegadeSlyckChucksunnyd
Downloading Ebooks and Textbooks – A Blog for Private Torrent Trackers & Piracy January 29, 2014
Posted by sandyclaus in Copyright and Trademark Enforcement, Internet Freedom, Politics.add a comment
Downloading Ebooks and Textbooks 8
28 Aug 2013 | Guides Tags: ebooks · textbooks
I have noticed many people looking for ebooks of their college books & textbooks..
I have written this guide to help people find ebooks & textbooks
Use these 4 steps
1) Search on Google
Search for the name of the book + download and/or epub, “.epub”, mobi, “.mobi”, pdf, “.pdf”
via Downloading Ebooks and Textbooks – A Blog for Private Torrent Trackers & Piracy.
Where do you guys get ebooks? : Piracy January 29, 2014
Posted by sandyclaus in Copyright and Trademark Enforcement, Internet Freedom, Politics.add a comment
This is a sub for all things piracy related. Although primarily about file-sharing, articles about ethical issues on \”unauthorized\” distribution, legal changes and challenges and so on are all welcome. Other topics fitting include actual real life or historical piracy, events relating to the Pirate parties and even the FSM (Ramen!).
“Origins of the Republican” download free. Electronic library. Finding books BookOS January 29, 2014
Posted by sandyclaus in Copyright and Trademark Enforcement, Internet Freedom, Politics.add a comment
BookZaThe world\’s largest ebook library .
via “Origins of the Republican” download free. Electronic library. Finding books BookOS.
Book Piracy Site.
Why MPAA’s Senior Executive Vice President Framed isoHunt | TorrentFreak January 9, 2014
Posted by sandyclaus in Copyright and Trademark Enforcement.add a comment
Quite surprisingly, the MPAA is not looking for new copyright legislation, and Fabrizio doesn’t believe in a revival of the much protested SOPA and PIPA bills. Instead, the MPAA will continue to focus on voluntary agreements, as well as building up its relations with academics who now tend to favor less stringent approaches to copyright law.
via Why MPAA’s Senior Executive Vice President Framed isoHunt | TorrentFreak.