jump to navigation

C.I.A. Admits Penetrating Senate Intelligence Computers – NYTimes.com July 31, 2014

Posted by sandyclaus in CIA, Security State.
add a comment

WASHINGTON — An internal investigation by the Central Intelligence Agency has found that its officers improperly penetrated a computer network used by the Senate Intelligence Committee to prepare its damning report on the C.I.A.’s detention and interrogation program.The report by the agency’s inspector general found that C.I.A. officers created a fake online identity to gain access on more than one occasion to computers used by members of the committee staff, and tried to cover their movements as they rooted around the system, according to an official with knowledge of the investigation’s findings.Continue reading the main storyFEATURED COMMENTJim R. CaliforniaThe separation of powers implications behind this are staggering. I’m a big supporter of the intelligence community and its very difficult job, but this is u-g-l-y, and the punishments severe.349 COMMENTS WRITE A COMMENTA statement issued Thursday morning by a C.I.A. spokesman said that John O. Brennan, the agency’s director, had apologized to the two senior members of the intelligence committee and would set up an internal accountability board to review the issue. The statement said that the board, which will be led by former Senator Evan Bayh, an Indiana Democrat, could recommend “potential disciplinary measures” and “steps to address systemic issues.”

via C.I.A. Admits Penetrating Senate Intelligence Computers – NYTimes.com.

DCI Statement on Allegations About SIGINT Activities — Central Intelligence Agency January 9, 2014

Posted by sandyclaus in CIA, NSA.
add a comment

Mr. Chairman, I am here today to discuss allegations about SIGINT activities and the so-called Echelon program of the National Security Agency with a very specific objective: To assure this Committee, the Congress, and the American public that the United States Intelligence Community is unequivocally committed to conducting its activities in accordance with US law and due regard for the rights of Americans.

Intelligence agencies normally do not, and should not, publicly reveal sensitive details about their operations. For this reason, signals intelligence—or SIGINT—activities may not be known or understood by the public at large. Their limits are well known to the members of this committee but, like me, you too cannot speak publicly as much as you would wish. As the Director of Central Intelligence with overall responsibility for establishing requirements and priorities for the collection of intelligence vital to our national security, I understand that the Intelligence Community must have the confidence of the American public to ensure we have an aggressive intelligence capability. I also know that our foreign allies have to be reassured that their trust in us is justified and that our relationships are beneficial from their perspectives.

via DCI Statement on Allegations About SIGINT Activities — Central Intelligence Agency.